Taylor Swift and Kim Kardashian among celebrities and influencers being blocked in droves by ‘digital guillotine’ on social media due to silence on Gaza

Taylor Swift and Kim Kardashian are among the highest profile names being blocked in droves on social media as users utilize a ‘digital guillotine’ on them and several other celebrities and influencers due to their silence on the situation in Gaza.

The pair of A-list rivals and many others have become targets of the ‘Block Out 2024’ movement, which began on TikTok in response to the perceived disconnect between the glamorous Met Gala and the grim realities of the Israel-Hamas conflict.

The 34-year-old pop megastar and 43-year-old SKIMS mogul – who enjoyed a night out at a WNBA game on Wednesday – have each lost hundreds of thousands of followers and have been blocked countless times due to not addressing the Israel-Palestine war in addition to other issues in the wake of last week’s celeb-packed Met Gala.

Reality star Kim – who attended the gala – has lost hundreds of thousands of Instagram followers in recent days, according to analytics site Social Blade.

Taylor, who opted to focus on her Eras Tour rather than appear at the event, has also seen a decline of more than 200,000 followers since last Thursday.

The social media movement comes as pro-Palestinian activists have flooded the comments sections of social media sites for months, urging stars to join calls for a ceasefire in Gaza’s deadliest war.

But matters came to a head after last week’s Met Gala, a glitzy fundraiser and the biggest night in fashion featuring A-list stars from screen, stage, sports and the world’s runways.

Dressed in an extravagant gown, influencer Haley Kalil posted on TikTok lip-synching ‘Let them eat cake’ — a phrase notoriously associated with Marie Antoinette that symbolizes the callous disregard of 18th century French aristocrats towards the poor.

Fellow TikToker ladyfromtheoutside, who started the movement, responded: ‘It’s time for the people to conduct what I want to call a digital guillotine, a digitine, if you will,’ referring to the execution apparatus used during the French Revolution.

‘Take our views away, our likes, our comments, our money,’ she urged.

Her message was taken up as a rallying cry for the pro-Palestinian movement, and early signs suggest the boycott may be having an impact.

‘This is about lives and justice — if she can rally all of us to vote, she has the power to speak up about injustice,” said a TikToker who described herself as a ‘Palestinian Swiftie’ and said it was time to block, unfollow and stop streaming her idol.

It’s uncertain whether the movement is directly responsible for the social media hits seen by some celebrities, or if other trends are at play.

Moreover, the losses could be short-lived, Natasha Lindstaedt, a University of Essex professor who has studied celebrity activism, told AFP.

‘Sometimes people make a decision based on an emotional response to an issue and decide that if a celebrity isn’t on the same side… they don’t want to follow them anymore, but that takes a second,’ she says.

This phenomenon is known in academic circles as ‘slacktivism’ — substituting low-stakes online actions like posting memes or liking posts, or choosing to unfollow a favorite star — for meaningful political engagement.

Instead of responding, celebrities might find it wiser to wait out the backlash, especially given the sensitive nature of the Gaza conflict, which has proven perilous for many stars.

Oscar-winning actress Susan Sarandon was dropped by her talent agency UTA after speaking at a pro-Palestine rally in November.

More recently, Jerry Seinfeld, long the model of an apolitical celebrity, has faced criticism for affiliating himself more closely with Israel.

That backlash against the Jewish comedian intensified after a report said his wife Jessica donated to a group of pro-Israel counter-protesters at UCLA, where violence broke out against pro-Palestinian demonstrators.

She later wrote on Instagram that she supported a peaceful rally days earlier and did not support or contribute to any violent actions.

According to David Jackson, a professor at Bowling Green State University who has studied how the political positions taken by stars affect their approval ratings, told AFP ‘there’s a history of celebrity involvement in politics that goes back a hundred years or more in the US.’

But with the advent of social media, it’s become easier for people to develop ‘parasocial’ relationships with stars — essentially one-way connections that feel reciprocal.

‘You have your network of people you follow, and some of them are people you know, and some of them are celebrities, and the boundaries, I suppose, can be blurred,’ Jackson said.

That false sense of closeness makes the feeling of betrayal all the more acute when celebrities take a position you disapprove of, or don’t take any position at all.

Even appearing to respond to fan demands can be risky.

When rapper Lizzo promoted a fundraiser to aid a Gazan doctor and his family in leaving the besieged Palestinian territory, she was criticized by many for her perceived opportunism.